VisualJitter applet requires Java 1.0.2 or later.
Please make sure that Java is enabled in your web browser.

Visual Jitter Demonstration

VisualJitter applet v0.50b written by Ikuya Murakami Jul/16/98 using CodeWarrior Pro 1 for Macintosh (Metrowerks) that supports Java Developers Kit 1.0.2 (Sun Microsystems). This software might show peculiar behavior depending on your local environment. I and my friends have checked that it runs all right on Netscape Navigator 4.04, 4.07 (for Macintosh), Netscape Communicator 4.5 (for Macintosh and Microsoft Windows 95), Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.01 (for Macintosh), Metrowerks Java 1.0.7 (for Macintosh), and Apple Applet Runner 2.0 (for Macintosh).
Java Save to your local disk (StuffIt + BinHex 52k)

A novel aftereffect: visual jitter in an unadapted static region after adaptation to dynamic random noise ((I. Murakami & P. Cavanagh)) ARVO '98.

Purpose. We report a new phenomenon: when dynamic random noise is replaced by a static one after a period of adaptation, static random noise in an adjacent unadapted region appears to "jitter" coherently in random directions for some time. Expanding on this phenomenon, our study suggests a process for realizing a stable visual world despite small eye movements. Methods. A fixation spot was provided throughout a trial. During adaptation, dynamic random noise was typically presented in a circular patch, 6.7° in diam., surrounded by a 13.3° outer-diam. annulus of static random noise. Static noise was presented in both regions in the test period, during which the duration of visual jitter was measured. For a stabilized image control, a high-intensity flash was used to induce a long-lasting afterimage of the random-noise test field. Results. (1) The effect usually lasted 5-10 s. (2) The two regions did not need to be concentric; they could be any shapes if they were relatively close to each other. (3) During adaptation, the surround could be filled with a blank field instead of static noise. (4) There was no interocular transfer. (5) There was storage during a blank period (> 20 s) between adaptation and test. (6) The jitter was synchronized in multiple test patches presented at remote locations. (7) Retinal stabilization during test totally abolished the aftereffect. Conclusions. Synchronized jitter at multiple locations and the loss of the effect in the stabilized image indicate that the jitter aftereffect reflects retinal slip due to eye-position fluctuation during test. As a model for compensating such retinal slip, we propose that motions in the world are estimated as deviations from some baseline minimum in the retinal velocity field. According to this model, adaptation to dynamic random noise transiently attenuates responses to retinal velocities at adapted sites, creating a new minimum, and other retinal velocities in the surround are computed as deviations from this new "baseline". In unadapted regions, unattenuated retinal slip due to eye movements is now interpreted as a jittering motion of those regions.

(1) If the cycling of the dot patterns is irregular or slow, try first quitting all other applications. If the speed remains irregular, the jitter aftereffect you will experience will be quite weak.

(2) The animation refresh rate is expected to be about equal to the scanning frequency of the monitor you use (e.g., 67Hz), but I found that the actual animation rate may be much lower for slower computers. In that case, try to decrease "Inter-frame Interval" -- it might slow the GUI update of the browser itself though.

(3) This demonstration simply stops animation during the test. In actual experiments, however, a totally different static noise pattern is redrawn.

back to Ikuya Murakami's page
back to Vision Sciences Home Page